tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-45241124732372585282024-03-13T05:15:59.411-04:00Speak truth to liberalsFighting communism one progressive at a time.Ken Weaverhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10988377417191573194noreply@blogger.comBlogger173125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4524112473237258528.post-5075997471220525642016-09-01T14:52:00.001-04:002016-09-01T14:52:32.033-04:00Now Really<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<!-- AddThis Button BEGIN -->
<br />
The democrat party is responsible for slavery, the hindering of civil rights legislation, the founding of the KKK, the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. , and the founding of a genocide project called the Negro Project (Planned Parenthood). <br /> Hillary Clinton publicly embraced a KKK recruiter named Robert Byrd and eulogized him and the founder of the Negro Project (Margret Sanger)while her husband Bill Clinton hung out with George Wallace and said to Ted Kennedy " a couple of years ago he'd be serving us coffee."<br />
And you have the unmitigated gall to call Donald Trump a racist after supporting those people? <br /> Sounds like a bad case of Stockholm Syndrome to me.<br />
<div>
<a class="addthis_button" expr:addthis:title="data:post.title" expr:addthis:url="data:post.url" href="https://www.blogger.com/null"><img alt="Bookmark and Share" src="http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif" height="16" style="border: 0px currentColor;" width="125" /></a>
<script src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js#pub=xa-4b288cb529c71e80" type="text/javascript"></script></div>
<!-- AddThis Button END --> </div>
Ken Weaverhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10988377417191573194noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4524112473237258528.post-78289760945317074392016-01-04T11:40:00.001-05:002016-01-04T11:40:47.993-05:00Long night into day<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<!-- AddThis Button BEGIN -->
This last four years has been a very long nightmare for America and the world.<br />
The people of America were misled by a Republican party into a candidate that didn't have more than six campaign offices in the whole state of Ohio. <br />
You can't win an election that way. And they had to know it. <br />
<br />
Rance Priebus must go!<br />
Along with his minions and the Romney fakes that won the nomination last time.<br />
Had I known then what I know now, I would never have predicted a victory.<br />
6 campaign offices in a state of 11.5 million? <br />
Who do they think they are fooling? <br />
<br />
We as conservative constitutionalists need to go state by state and pick candidates who do what they say.<br />
To hell with party. <br />
It's time to contribute to individuals.<br />
<br />
I have decided to revive this blog. <br />
<br />
It's time to resume the fight!<br />
<br />
<br />
<div>
<a class="addthis_button" expr:addthis:title="data:post.title" expr:addthis:url="data:post.url" href="https://www.blogger.com/null"><img alt="Bookmark and Share" src="http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif" height="16" style="border: 0px currentColor;" width="125" /></a>
<script src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js#pub=xa-4b288cb529c71e80" type="text/javascript"></script></div>
<!-- AddThis Button END --><br /></div>
Ken Weaverhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10988377417191573194noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4524112473237258528.post-58759024255041659152016-01-04T11:01:00.000-05:002016-01-04T11:01:21.992-05:00The Whole Rant<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<!-- AddThis Button BEGIN -->
We need to nationalize the Federal Reserve. I mean take it away from the banksters that own it now.<br />
We need to confiscate the debt that they created for themselves to buy, so they can keep it as a yoke on the American people. We need to cancel all of it and then take the remaining money in the Reserve and put it in the Social Security Trust Fund.<br />
Then we need to turn control of your personal SS account over to you to invest like an IRA.<br />
It would still be taken from your paycheck, but you would have real control over it. The government would NOT be allowed to touch it ever again.<br />
<br />
After that we need to pass the Fair Tax. <a href="http://www.fairtax.org/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.fairtax.org</a><br />
This will eliminate the 23% tax on America's export trade that the Income Tax really is.<br />
Eliminate the IRS within 3 years, the Statute of limitations for tax filing.<br />
<br />
We need to eliminate the ACA (Obamacare). Then allow insurance companies to compete across state lines. <br />
<br />
Then we need to legalize drugs.<br />
The people that want drugs kept illegal all benefit from it in some way.<br />
The Mafia turns a profit<br />
The Politician gets an issue to demogogue<br />
The Priest/Rabbi/Pastor/Mullah gets to rail against the evils of drug use.<br />
The terrorist gets a source of funding.<br />
<br />
All that goes away if you legalize them and you can grow marijuana and coca in your back yard.<br />
The crime stops because nobody has to steal to get a buzz.<br />
Law enforcement gets a break to fight real crime.<br />
Prisons suddenly don't have to let out the hard criminals to house druggies.<br />
You get to tax what is sold to fund treatment programs.<br />
You get to pay less tax on prison space from overcrowded prisons with revolving doors.<br />
People get jobs selling legal drugs.<br />
Since it costs less to get high you have fewer people on social services.<br />
A bag of weed that goes for $100.00 now will sell for about $5.00.<br />
The funding for terrorists goes away.<br />
Border traffic gets less dangerous for our border patrol because there would be no reason to import what you can grow. And it would be legal anyway.<br />
The underground balance of trade would stop hemmoraghing our nations cash.<br />
Fewer cops get killed trying to stop crazed drug trafficers.<br />
Gang activity would almost cease.<br />
Our neighborhoods would be safer.<br />
<br />
The whole thing makes money available to bribe politicians with. It makes it possible to intimidate people to keep them from talking. It makes prostitution necessary for many women hooked on drugs by pimps that use them for a source of income.<br />
This is why we should also legalize prostitution. Eliminate the pimp and the prostitute may get help. She will certainly be able to keep her money and get treated for diseases. The dirty politician won't be able to intimidate the prostitute into silence. Neither could the dirty priest/pastor/rabbi. They would have no hold over the prostitute.<br />
I could go on and on.<br />
But will the dogmatists listen?<br />
<br />
Why would a God fearing American help drug dealers make money off of your kids?<br />
Why would they let the pimps be able to bribe politicians into turning your daughter into a hooker?<br />
Legalize it and control it and tax it and that will stop.<br />
<br />
Punish the acts of the individual. Not society as a whole.<br />
Punish the drunk driver but keep alcohol legal.<br />
Punish the drugged driver but make drugs legal.<br />
<br />
Only a dealer would be against legalization.<br />
Or maybe a terrorist. Or a politician trying to hide something.<br />
Or a priest/rabbi/pastor/imam trying to hide something.<br />
Or a brainwashed true believer. <br />
<div>
<a class="addthis_button" expr:addthis:title="data:post.title" expr:addthis:url="data:post.url" href="https://www.blogger.com/null"><img alt="Bookmark and Share" src="http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif" height="16" style="border: 0px currentColor;" width="125" /></a>
<script src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js#pub=xa-4b288cb529c71e80" type="text/javascript"></script></div>
<!-- AddThis Button END --><br /></div>
Ken Weaverhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10988377417191573194noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4524112473237258528.post-30323718176767417792012-10-31T02:28:00.001-04:002012-10-31T02:28:07.371-04:00Election 2012 MY prediction. <div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<!-- AddThis Button BEGIN --><br />
<div>
Mitt Romney will win the Presidency with 330 electoral votes and a margin of popular vote of around 8%. <br />
<br />
The Republicans will win 8-12 Senate seats from the democrats. <br />
<br />
The Republicans will win about 12 extra House seats to add to their already comfortable margin.<br />
<br />
<br />
I was correct to within 2 House seats and 3 Senate seats in 2010. <br />
<br />
Obama is toast.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a class="addthis_button" expr:addthis:title="data:post.title" expr:addthis:url="data:post.url" href="http://www.blogger.com/null"><img alt="Bookmark and Share" height="16" src="http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif" style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px;" width="125" /></a> <script src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js#pub=xa-4b288cb529c71e80" type="text/javascript"></script></div>
<!-- AddThis Button END --></div>
Ken Weaverhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10988377417191573194noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4524112473237258528.post-39937801023946771762012-07-18T03:21:00.001-04:002012-07-18T03:21:51.888-04:00Perfect Romney Campaign Slogan<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div>
<br />
"YES WE CAN" became "NO YOU DIDN'T!"<br />
<br />
<a class="addthis_button" expr:addthis:title="data:post.title" expr:addthis:url="data:post.url" href=""><img alt="Bookmark and Share" height="16" src="http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif" style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px;" width="125" /></a><script src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js#pub=xa-4b288cb529c71e80" type="text/javascript">
</script> </div>
</div>Ken Weaverhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10988377417191573194noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4524112473237258528.post-69192818380493466732012-07-01T03:17:00.001-04:002012-07-01T04:08:23.380-04:00The Medicare expansion restriction and the highway<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div>
The ruling from the Supreme Court on Obamacare makes the Medicare expansion requirement on states unconstitutional. How does this affect Federal Highway Funds and the national speed limit requirement? <br />
<br />
How does it affect a myriad of other things that Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts intended to imply by his ruling about the federal government bullying state governments? <br />
I really think he was using some parts of this ruling to disguise other things. The liberals didn't have the mental acuity to decipher why he would side with them. They were too elated to be concerned......LMAO!<br />
<br />
<br />
<a class="addthis_button" expr:addthis:title="data:post.title" expr:addthis:url="data:post.url" href="http://www.blogger.com/"><img alt="Bookmark and Share" height="16" src="http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif" style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px;" width="125" /></a><script src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js#pub=xa-4b288cb529c71e80" type="text/javascript">
</script> </div>
</div>Ken Weaverhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10988377417191573194noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4524112473237258528.post-80389199325057203132012-06-29T13:23:00.000-04:002012-06-29T14:51:35.210-04:00Chief Justice Roberts in Liliput.<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div>
I was stunned by the Supreme court ruling like everybody else.<br />
But then I read it. <br />
<br />
Chief Justice John Roberts is no less a genius than the founders in his ruling and opinion. <br />
<br />
First he made plain the restrictions on the commerce clause. <br />
Then he made plain the limits of the Necessary and proper clause.<br />
He did this with the mindful intent of creating stare decisis in this case and referring to previous case law. <br />
And he used the liberal members of the court to do it, tying their hands in future cases, as surely as if he'd become a hypnotist.<br />
<br />
Chief Justice Roberts has also made it plain, that a new case may be brought in the future, when the tax takes effect. This is the open door he left himself to return to the law, should congress fail to act.<br />
<br />
Chief Justice Roberts has also taken a slap at President Obama saying that, in the Opinion of the Court, the law is deeply flawed. Now you have to run on it. <br />
I and he remember the slap Obama took at the Court in the State of the Union Adress. This is his redress of that greivance. <br />
<br />
He has also taken a swing at all of the people who have decried an activist court. Saying that he finds the law constitutional mindful of the intent of congress' majority in passing the law. <br />
This reminds me of all of the outcry after the Kelo decision, the use of the Court in the campaign finance Law by Republicans and Democrats to passs an unconstitutional law that the court was INTENDED to knock down so the congress and President Bush could hide behind the Court for political expedience.<br />
It reminds me of the outcry after this most recent decision over the Arizona immigration law. <br />
<br />
First you want the court to refrain and then you want the court to intervene and you then use them for political expedience. <br />
<br />
Chief Justice Roberts has slapped you in the face for this and made the liberals and conservatives on the court look like a bunch of Liliputians.<br />
Especially the liberals. He got you to sign this opinion.<br />
<br />
I'm sure he's somewhere having a good laugh at the pundits expense. <br />
<br />
I know I am........<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a class="addthis_button" expr:addthis:title="data:post.title" expr:addthis:url="data:post.url" href="http://www.blogger.com/"><img alt="Bookmark and Share" height="16" src="http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif" style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px;" width="125" /></a><script src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js#pub=xa-4b288cb529c71e80" type="text/javascript">
</script> </div>
</div>Ken Weaverhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10988377417191573194noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4524112473237258528.post-13856594520134760582012-05-26T22:46:00.000-04:002012-05-26T22:48:24.439-04:00Obama Slow Growth record.<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div>
Obama is claiming to have stopped the growth of spending. Not so. It was the Republican takeover of the House in January of 2011 that stopped the growth of the government behemoth. I haven't heard a single conservative pundit mention this in the wake of that stupid graph that came out showing slow growth of government. <br />
<br />
Are these guys asleep at the wheel?<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a class="addthis_button" expr:addthis:title="data:post.title" expr:addthis:url="data:post.url" href="http://www.blogger.com/"><img alt="Bookmark and Share" height="16" src="http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif" style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px;" width="125" /></a><script src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js#pub=xa-4b288cb529c71e80" type="text/javascript">
</script> </div>
</div>Ken Weaverhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10988377417191573194noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4524112473237258528.post-2838544811887461552012-05-11T03:17:00.002-04:002012-05-11T03:18:25.713-04:00Obama and gay marriage<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div>
The Vacillator in Cheif declared that he supported states rights on gay marriage regulations(which have been declared illegal in 34 states) and he is declared a great man for it because he said he is personally in favor of the practice of gay marriage in the same statement. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Pontious Pilate washed his hands............ <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a class="addthis_button" expr:addthis:title="data:post.title" expr:addthis:url="data:post.url" href="http://www.blogger.com/"><img alt="Bookmark and Share" height="16" src="http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif" style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px;" width="125" /></a><script src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js#pub=xa-4b288cb529c71e80" type="text/javascript">
</script> </div>
</div>Ken Weaverhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10988377417191573194noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4524112473237258528.post-23025320595873393262012-03-04T14:35:00.005-05:002012-03-09T21:55:07.345-05:00No Newt, No How, No Way.<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on"><div>Here's why No Newt! <br />
<br />
<br />
1994 + 12 = 2006. That's the effect of Newt's insistence on term limits pledges for Conservatives back when he "led" the Contract with America. <br />
<br />
As soon as that was "accomplished" he began talking about how the era of Reagan was over and started running around with Nancy Pelosi and Hillary Clinton and campaigning for the likes of Scozzafava in NY 23. <br />
<br />
It's a sure sign that he was a plant and still is.<br />
<br />
For those I have to spell it out for.<br />
<br />
1994 was the year the conservative revolution took over the house and senate during Clinton's first term.<br />
<br />
2006 was the year the democrats swept back into power in congress. And Newt began saying the Era of Reagan was over.<br />
<br />
Get it? Treachery at it's finest.<br />
<br />
Newt Gingrich believes in manmade Global Warming. <br />
<br />
Santorum does not.<br />
<br />
Gingrich has toured with Nancy Pelosi and Hillary Clinton. <br />
<br />
Santorum has not.<br />
<br />
Gingrich has called himself a moderate and a libertarian progressive to triangulate on power.<br />
<br />
Rick Santorum lost an election to stand on conservative principle, to Robert P. Casey jr. This was during the liberal democrat landslide of 2006 (which Newt engineered) when the Republican party had lost it's way and took out Santorum with it.<br />
<br />
Gingrich has been in bed with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. <br />
<br />
Santorum tried to shut them down.<br />
<br />
Gingrich backed Scozzafava for NY 23 against a real conservative named Doug Hoffman. <br />
<br />
Santorum has tirelessly worked to elect real conservatives. He doesn't waver.<br />
<br />
Newt Gingrich is unstable and uninformed.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-k8Te0NxhJ4&feature=related">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-k8Te0NxhJ4&feature=related</a><br />
<br />
<br />
PS. Why would you believe conservative loyalty from a man who cheated on his wife? Do you think he would keep those promises ?<br />
<br />
No Newt, No Way, No How. <br />
<br />
<br />
<a class="addthis_button" expr:addthis:title="data:post.title" expr:addthis:url="data:post.url" href="about:blank"><img alt="Bookmark and Share" height="16" src="http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif" style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px;" width="125" /></a><script src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js#pub=xa-4b288cb529c71e80" type="text/javascript">
</script> </div></div>Ken Weaverhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10988377417191573194noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4524112473237258528.post-59056748177672669452012-02-08T05:06:00.000-05:002012-02-08T05:06:33.054-05:00A wild hair theory.<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on"><div>I have been reading through some half baked threads on some internet forums. They are theorizing on the beginnings of the universe. <br />
<br />
I asked one guy about the "universal constant" that Einstein used in his original Special Theory, because he assumed a static universe. The guy didn't know what the hell I was talking about. It seems it has been renamed the "Cosmological Constant" since I was in High School in the seventies. They don't even teach it any more. <br />
<br />
But I digress.<br />
<br />
My theory has to do with the theory of the big bang and the singularity. the successive discovery of the red shift that eliminated the cosmologiacl constant and the new discovery of possible accelerated expansion that may revive the theory of a cosmological constant and the even more recent discovery of a region of space ( by Australian astronomers) that seems to be emitting electrons that are moving at the wrong red shift. <br />
<br />
What if there were multiple big bangs. We are in the epicenter of one. The odd emmissions are coming from another. They would be arranged like a cubic gridwork, with bang points at the cross hairs, or possibly like beads on a string?<br />
That's all I wanted to point out. It's possible.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a class="addthis_button" expr:addthis:title="data:post.title" expr:addthis:url="data:post.url" href=""><img alt="Bookmark and Share" height="16px" src="http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif" style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px;" width="125px" /></a><script src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js#pub=xa-4b288cb529c71e80" type="text/javascript">
</script> </div></div>Ken Weaverhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10988377417191573194noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4524112473237258528.post-14144111591458990672011-12-19T01:15:00.005-05:002012-01-31T17:29:39.067-05:00Fixing America<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on"><div>America is in a financial bind. I know how to get us out of it.<br />
<br />
U.S.Savings Bonds should be given to everybody that has paid into the Social Security System to replace all of the money we put into it in premium payments. We can't give the money back directly but we can do it long term in the form of bonds. The bonds would be negotiable instruments with definite term of maturity. These bonds would have the same interest rate as the T-Bill rate on the day of issue, thus creating a ready market for them. People would be able to opt out from the social security system, over the age of 55, in favor of getting the bonds. Under 55 it would be mandatory. <br />
Purchase of the bonds would be mandatory for 30 years after the start of the program from payrolls as a substitute for being in Social Security. This will continue to fund the system for those who opt to stay in the Social Security system.<br />
This has several benefits.<br />
First there would be a government backed security you can place in your own retirement account. <br />
Second you will have a tangible asset that you can use as a basis of credit. <br />
Third you would have a salable asset to use to back your purchase of a home or any other type of real investment you might want to pursue. <br />
Fourth it would eliminate the open ended obligation that is now on the back of the taxpaying public citizen.<br />
Fifth it will wean Americans off of the government dependency merry go round.<br />
Sixth it will restore American solvency and be a bigger stimulus than anything you ever saw.<br />
Seventh it will give you something to pass on to your children. Thus building family cohesion.<br />
<br />
Social Security has been like a vampire sucking blood out of this economy for 70 years. It's time to give our blood back.<br />
<br />
<span style="color: red;">Edits and additions:</span><br />
<br />
I have seemingly left out provisions for disability coverages. This should be addressed in a separate fund. I am quite certain we can afford disability payments much easier than we can afford open ended retirement accounts, and death panels in state run medical coverage, intended to shorten the pay out for medical and retirement benefits. (the back door deficit reduction effort of liberal fascism)<br />
The 2010 payout in social security disability insurance was $127 billion. Much less than the $2.336 trillion for retirement benefits that is expected to grow nearly exponentialy. This can be done from the general fund.<br />
<br />
<a class="addthis_button" expr:addthis:title="data:post.title" expr:addthis:url="data:post.url" href="http://www.blogger.com/"><img alt="Bookmark and Share" height="16px" src="http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif" style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px;" width="125px" /></a><script src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js#pub=xa-4b288cb529c71e80" type="text/javascript">
</script> </div></div>Ken Weaverhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10988377417191573194noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4524112473237258528.post-26528018803862056002011-12-07T19:45:00.000-05:002011-12-07T19:45:31.539-05:00My ideas being stolen.<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on"><div><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fl8GvPRvikM&feature=related">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fl8GvPRvikM&feature=related</a><br />
<br />
<br />
My previous prediction:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://speaktruthtoliberals.blogspot.com/2007/12/human-telepathy-coming-soon.html">http://speaktruthtoliberals.blogspot.com/2007/12/human-telepathy-coming-soon.html</a><br />
<br />
<br />
<a class="addthis_button" expr:addthis:title="data:post.title" expr:addthis:url="data:post.url" href=""><img alt="Bookmark and Share" height="16" src="http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif" style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px;" width="125" /></a><script src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js#pub=xa-4b288cb529c71e80" type="text/javascript">
</script> </div></div>Ken Weaverhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10988377417191573194noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4524112473237258528.post-4926889995701113382011-11-28T22:02:00.002-05:002012-12-29T01:24:19.216-05:00Climategate Updated<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div>
<br />
First they try to downplay the medieval warm period:<br />
<a href="http://www.nctimes.com/app/blogs/wp/?p=7465">http://www.nctimes.com/app/blogs/wp/?p=7465</a><br />
<br />
Then try to deny it entirely:<br />
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/11233/1168499-373-0.stm<br />
<br />
Then they interfere with peer review:<br />
<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/feb/02/hacked-climate-emails-flaws-peer-review">http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/feb/02/hacked-climate-emails-flaws-peer-review</a><br />
<br />
The Sea level claims were bogus<br />
<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/02/13/us-climate-seas-idUSTRE61C1V420100213">http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/02/13/us-climate-seas-idUSTRE61C1V420100213</a><br />
<br />
The melting of the Glaciers was bogus and exaggerated:<br />
<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/jan/20/ipcc-himalayan-glaciers-mistake">http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/jan/20/ipcc-himalayan-glaciers-mistake</a><br />
<br />
The station Data were hidden:<br />
<a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2066240/Second-leak-climate-emails-Political-giants-weigh-bias-scientists-bowing-financial-pressure-sponsors.html">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2066240/Second-leak-climate-emails-Political-giants-weigh-bias-scientists-bowing-financial-pressure-sponsors.html</a><br />
<br />
Stations were moved:<br />
<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/feb/01/dispute-weather-fraud">http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/feb/01/dispute-weather-fraud</a><br />
<br />
Some are completely missing:<br />
<a href="http://www.global-information-network-society.com/scientists-using-selective-temperature-data-skeptics-say.html">http://www.global-information-network-society.com/scientists-using-selective-temperature-data-skeptics-say.html</a><br />
<br />
The 1990's were not the warmest on record after a glitch in a program was found:<br />
<a href="http://www.dailytech.com/Blogger+Finds+Y2K+Bug+in+NASA+Climate+Data/article8383.htm">http://www.dailytech.com/Blogger+Finds+Y2K+Bug+in+NASA+Climate+Data/article8383.htm</a><br />
<br />
Carbon Trading behind the money for Climate research:<br />
<a href="http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/0082826">http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/0082826</a><br />
<br />
And to top it all off Wikipedia was compromised:<br />
<a href="http://spectator.org/archives/2009/12/30/wikipedia-meets-its-own-climat">http://spectator.org/archives/2009/12/30/wikipedia-meets-its-own-climat</a><br />
<br />
Now read all about it and tell me that you have NO DOUBT about the conclusions of the IPCC.<br />
<br />
Kiss my ass Bowerbird.<br />
<br />
<a class="addthis_button" expr:addthis:title="data:post.title" expr:addthis:url="data:post.url" href="http://www.blogger.com/"><img alt="Bookmark and Share" height="16" src="http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif" style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px;" width="125" /></a><script src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js#pub=xa-4b288cb529c71e80" type="text/javascript">
</script> </div>
</div>
Ken Weaverhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10988377417191573194noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4524112473237258528.post-18776288746343399972011-11-18T22:24:00.000-05:002011-11-18T22:24:33.384-05:00Socialism vs. Capitalism and A Representative Republic<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on"><div>The real problem with all forms of state controlled econmies is a simple one. There is no other outlet for mans need for power. In state controlled economies the power structure does not allow a separate track for monetary power versus political power. These meld into one and therefore become dictaorships. It has never failed. Mao, Stalin, Pol Pot, Hitler, the list is endless. The difference between this and capitalist republics is the ability to have a safety valve for those seeking personal power. With the right government structure and a well educated populace we can keep our liberties intact. But only if we keep certain people from taking over the education of our children. This is what the current fight is about in Wisconsin. It's what the fight is about across the nation. <br />
We need to repeal the income tax amendment. [16]<br />
We need to repeal the direct election of Senators.[17]<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a class="addthis_button" expr:addthis:title="data:post.title" expr:addthis:url="data:post.url" href=""><img alt="Bookmark and Share" height="16" src="http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif" style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px;" width="125" /></a><script src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js#pub=xa-4b288cb529c71e80" type="text/javascript">
</script> </div></div>Ken Weaverhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10988377417191573194noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4524112473237258528.post-74238055585560759962011-11-15T12:20:00.001-05:002012-01-10T03:17:02.328-05:00Chinese desert patterns.<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on"><div>The giant patterns in the Chinese desert are various scientific, military and mining structures. The bright blue ones are Copper sulfate solution being dried out of solution. You can see the harvesting machinery in the one on the left (link below) near the crux of the angular conjunction. Just zoom in on Google earth. The mining operation can be plainly seen by following the major roadway leading northeast from the site to the mountainous looking terrain north of the wide bisecting street. To the right of that you will find a group of other grid patterns that are a giant windmill farm. This grid pattern is not in the Gizmodo shots. It is located surrounding 40º40' N 95º45' E. This windmill farm has one section that is six miles long by four miles wide. <br />
<br />
The grid pattern in the last gizmodo shot is of a giant radio telescope being built there. It is in a cross pattern if you zoom out a bit. If you zoom in much closer wou will see another grid pattern that has an alignment of tower structures that are arranged in a pattern of 4x6. I believe these to be antennae frameworks.<br />
<br />
The concentric ring pattern is of an abandoned nuclear test zone that went unused after the Chinese gave up nuclear testing.<br />
<br />
The square block buildings are part of another bomb testing facility, obviously for conventional bombs judging from the blast pattern and crater visible in the photo. <br />
<br />
The facility with the cooling towers is probably just what it looks like. A nuclear power plant for the desert operations. They probably need it for times without much wind. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5859081/why-is-china-building-these-gigantic-structures-in-the-middle-of-the-desert">http://gizmodo.com/5859081/why-is-china-building-these-gigantic-structures-in-the-middle-of-the-desert</a><br />
<br />
<a class="addthis_button" expr:addthis:title="data:post.title" expr:addthis:url="data:post.url" href="http://www.blogger.com/"><img alt="Bookmark and Share" height="16" src="http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif" style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px;" width="125" /></a><script src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js#pub=xa-4b288cb529c71e80" type="text/javascript">
</script> </div></div>Ken Weaverhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10988377417191573194noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4524112473237258528.post-11729684067969088672011-11-11T19:33:00.000-05:002012-05-26T22:56:55.487-04:00To Mark Levin.<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div>
A message to Mark Levin on his facebook page from me:<br />
<br />
Mark. I don't think anybody has realised the link between Herman Cain's problems and Bill Clinton and the slapdown that Herman did of his healthcare plan in a debate in 1994 WHILE HE WAS AT THE National Restaurant Association. <br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.youtube.com/embed/vy542UgSelQ?feature=player_embedded' frameborder='0'></iframe></div>
This is why there is a link to the charges at the NRA and no other place. Clinton went after him back then for making him look bad. I'll bet we can find a link between these women and the Clinton administration.<br />
<br />
<a class="addthis_button" expr:addthis:title="data:post.title" expr:addthis:url="data:post.url" href="http://www.blogger.com/"><img alt="Bookmark and Share" height="16" src="http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif" style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px;" width="125" /></a><script src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js#pub=xa-4b288cb529c71e80" type="text/javascript">
</script> </div>
</div>Ken Weaverhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10988377417191573194noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4524112473237258528.post-12013691907914858222011-11-10T21:04:00.002-05:002011-11-11T19:01:15.029-05:00Lakeshore and The Chronic Homeless Plan<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on"><div>I just sent this email to Hallerin Hilton Hill at WOKI. He seems to think people in South Knoxville are needlessly paranoid about our treatment by the city fathers.<br />
<br />
Guess what the new facility for the "Chronically Homeless" in South Knoxville is really for Hallerin? It just so happens that Lakeshore will be shut down soon. I get this information mere hours before it will be announced to you in the press. Guess where those people will wind up? And now the Ten Year Plan is dead in the water with only one Facility built. Guess where that is Hallerin? Still think people in South Knoxville are paranoid Hallerin? <br />
<br />
<br />
This has been a damned setup the whole time. And you're probably still going to put the blinders on for it.<br />
I hope they pay you well. Do you sleep well Hallerin?<br />
<br />
PS!<br />
The Email address given by WOKI for his show kicks the emails back as undeliverable. <br />
<br />
<a class="addthis_button" expr:addthis:title="data:post.title" expr:addthis:url="data:post.url" href="http://www.blogger.com/"><img alt="Bookmark and Share" height="16" src="http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif" style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px;" width="125" /></a><script src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js#pub=xa-4b288cb529c71e80" type="text/javascript">
</script> </div></div>Ken Weaverhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10988377417191573194noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4524112473237258528.post-92171393439364869722011-11-08T10:52:00.001-05:002011-11-08T11:05:14.166-05:00An open letter to the Right to work Foundation and Organized Labor<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on"><div>To Mark Mix at the Right to work Foundation:<br />
<br />
Here's a question for YOU. Why haven't you pointed out that the UAW still has a $1 billion strike fund when we the taxpayer bailed out their jobs. They should have to fork that over to us.<br />
<br />
<br />
Why haven't you done anything about this?<br />
<br />
Why am I not believing you are serious?<br />
<br />
To the leaders of the UAW:<br />
<br />
You don't make me believe one word coming from your mouths. You have a billion dollar strike fund still available after the American taxpayer bailed your sorry asses out. You helped create this mess with overburdensome benefit packages you struck for. Making American Auto manufacturing uncompetitive with the rest of the world. Your union should be banned until we can confiscate that fund.<br />
<br />
<br />
Cough it up or shut up.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a class="addthis_button" expr:addthis:title="data:post.title" expr:addthis:url="data:post.url" href="http://www.blogger.com/"><img alt="Bookmark and Share" height="16" src="http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif" style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px;" width="125" /></a><script src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js#pub=xa-4b288cb529c71e80" type="text/javascript">
</script> </div></div>Ken Weaverhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10988377417191573194noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4524112473237258528.post-3902521715644907292011-11-07T22:32:00.000-05:002011-11-07T22:32:21.784-05:00Herman Cain and the 15 minute gap<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on"><div>Answer me this question. How do you reach up a skirt and drag somebody's head down at the same time. One hand would block the other. Try doing this in a car seat. I dare you to test what she said in an actual factual setting. Think of the physical movements needed to do this.<br />
<br />
<br />
It's kind of like the 15 minute gap in the Watergate tapes and the stretch that Nixons Secretary would have had to do to erase that tape.<br />
<br />
It doesn't make any sense. <br />
<br />
And Mark Levin pointed out that she didn't tell Mr Cain why she went out for drinks and then to dinner with him until they were seated for dinner. Kind of sounds like she was leading him to the pasture in the first place.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a class="addthis_button" expr:addthis:title="data:post.title" expr:addthis:url="data:post.url" href=""><img alt="Bookmark and Share" height="16" src="http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif" style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px;" width="125" /></a><script src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js#pub=xa-4b288cb529c71e80" type="text/javascript">
</script> </div></div>Ken Weaverhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10988377417191573194noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4524112473237258528.post-28645402870534025722011-11-01T02:55:00.002-04:002011-11-01T02:55:46.326-04:00Roach patrol<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on"><div>I know a way to trap Roaches with a clarion call! I found a stove with a problem in it's electronics. It was jam packed with roaches. They were all pointed toward a single chip inside the controller box. I am working towards making a device that will draw roaches out of the woodwork.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a class="addthis_button" expr:addthis:title="data:post.title" expr:addthis:url="data:post.url" href=""><img alt="Bookmark and Share" height="16" src="http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif" style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px;" width="125" /></a><script src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js#pub=xa-4b288cb529c71e80" type="text/javascript">
</script> </div></div>Ken Weaverhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10988377417191573194noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4524112473237258528.post-69357755814074367442011-07-31T23:59:00.001-04:002011-08-11T02:46:16.243-04:00The Debt Limit Plan<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on"><div><div closure_uid_cny8ox="535">So they have reached a deal have they? Lets take some time and read this puppy. We don't need anybody rushing this thing into law before we see what the wording contains. If it's like the budget deal and the health care deal, We need to think long and hard before passing it. I want to see the bill number for the House before they even schedule a vote.</div><div closure_uid_cny8ox="535"><div closure_uid_4i1afa="518">I smell railroad job here and a big dead rat next to the tracks. </div></div><div closure_uid_cny8ox="535"><br />
</div><div closure_uid_cny8ox="535"> <a class="addthis_button" expr:addthis:title="data:post.title" expr:addthis:url="data:post.url" href="http://www.blogger.com/"><img alt="Bookmark and Share" height="16" src="http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif" style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px;" width="125" /></a><script src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js#pub=xa-4b288cb529c71e80" type="text/javascript">
</script> </div></div></div>Ken Weaverhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10988377417191573194noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4524112473237258528.post-1760118608167175572011-06-26T11:58:00.000-04:002011-06-26T11:58:21.498-04:00Backdoor Stimulus<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on"><div>The Obama Administration has released part of the Strategic Oil Reserve to ostensibly combat oil prices. But it's really a campaign move. It's designed to leave more spending money in peoples pockets just before the election cycle. <br />
<br />
That's what this is. A backdoor stimulus package. I'll bet there are other things they are going to do. Did you notice how easily we got the ethanol subsidies cut? Corn prices will drop now, making food prices for things like Beef go down. There is a pattern. This was the very week of the troop drawdown announcement.<br />
<br />
<br />
Yes the campaign is in full swing mode. <br />
I wonder what kind of other backdoor stimulus these guys are hatching?<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a class="addthis_button" expr:addthis:title="data:post.title" expr:addthis:url="data:post.url" href=""><img alt="Bookmark and Share" height="16" src="http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif" style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px;" width="125" /></a><script src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js#pub=xa-4b288cb529c71e80" type="text/javascript">
</script> </div></div>Ken Weaverhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10988377417191573194noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4524112473237258528.post-33281938431445867552011-06-16T23:40:00.000-04:002011-06-16T23:40:18.948-04:00Online ammo purchases<div>There was a law that was knocked down in California that required fingerprints and ID to get ammunition, thus outlawing online sales. I applaud that decision.<br />
<br />
What the left doing here is using the falacious argument of who should be ALLOWED to have a gun. They set up the scenario by weakening sentencing laws so people would be afraid of the felons getting out and getting guns. Then they say that everybody should have to pass a background check to get a gun so felons can't get them. The huge hole in the argument is that if a felon wants a gun he's going to get one and background checks be damned. He's a felon after all and doesn't care about laws. This is used to get information on who has applied for PERMISSION to have a gun. This way they will know who to confiscate them from. They've been working on this for a very long time. They are statists who want to establish a dictatorship.<br />
<br />
If you think somebody is too dangerous to have a gun, they should still be behind bars. They don't care about your stupid laws. And you know it.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a class="addthis_button" expr:addthis:title="data:post.title" expr:addthis:url="data:post.url" href=""><img alt="Bookmark and Share" height="16" src="http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif" style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px;" width="125" /></a><script src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js#pub=xa-4b288cb529c71e80" type="text/javascript">
</script> </div>Ken Weaverhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10988377417191573194noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4524112473237258528.post-35446731642469889072011-06-05T15:36:00.000-04:002011-06-05T15:36:02.412-04:00To be a conservative<div>Do you know what it means to be a "conservative"? We believe that since the turn of the last century this country has been dragged down a liberal path to hell. The imposition of morals laws was the beginning of this move. The prohibition movement and then the marijuana tax act of 1920 led America down a path of statist control over our lives that must be broken down to it's very roots. They began to push for the income tax and that led to using the tax code to control the states. Drive 55, low flow toilets and Curly Fry Light bulbs are just a few of the things that they impose on your daily life in the interests of taking care of you because "you don't know any better". They have promoted the assasination of babies and saving murderers from execution. It is the movement to immerse this nation and the world with doublespeak so they can control you through language and thought. They are taking our property rights and attempting to take our guns so we can't defend ourselves from them.<br />
<br />
<br />
Now they want to take control of your medical decisions through government run health care. They want this so they can get rid of you after your useful years are behind you. Do the words Death Panels ring any bells? This is being done so they can keep their power and say that Social Security is solvent, and they were right all along. The faster you die under state medicine the sooner they get to stop paying you benefits.<br />
<br />
Get a clue people. It's coming if we don't drive the statists from the republican party and use it to drive the communists from power in Washington. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a class="addthis_button" expr:addthis:title="data:post.title" expr:addthis:url="data:post.url" href=""><img alt="Bookmark and Share" height="16" src="http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif" style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px;" width="125" /></a><script src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js#pub=xa-4b288cb529c71e80" type="text/javascript">
</script> </div>Ken Weaverhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10988377417191573194noreply@blogger.com0