A wild hair theory.

I have been reading through some half baked threads on some internet forums. They are theorizing on the beginnings of the universe.

I asked one guy about the "universal constant" that Einstein used in his original Special Theory, because he assumed a static universe. The guy didn't know what the hell I was talking about. It seems it has been renamed the "Cosmological Constant" since I was in High School in the seventies. They don't even teach it any more.

But I digress.

My theory has to do with the theory of the big bang and the singularity. the successive discovery of the red shift that eliminated the cosmologiacl constant and the new discovery of possible accelerated expansion that may revive the theory of a cosmological constant and the even more recent discovery of a region of space ( by Australian astronomers) that seems to be emitting electrons that are moving at the wrong red shift.

What if there were multiple big bangs. We are in the epicenter of one. The odd emmissions are coming from another. They would be arranged like a cubic gridwork, with bang points at the cross hairs, or possibly like beads on a string?
That's all I wanted to point out. It's possible.

Fixing America

America is in a financial bind. I know how to get us out of it.

U.S.Savings Bonds should be given to everybody that has paid into the Social Security System to replace all of the money we put into it in premium payments. We can't give the money back directly but we can do it long term in the form of bonds. The bonds would be negotiable instruments with definite term of maturity. These bonds would have the same interest rate as the T-Bill rate on the day of issue, thus creating a ready market for them. People would be able to opt out from the social security system, over the age of 55, in favor of getting the bonds. Under 55 it would be mandatory.
Purchase of the bonds would be mandatory for 30 years after the start of the program from payrolls as a substitute for being in Social Security. This will continue to fund the system for those who opt to stay in the Social Security system.
This has several benefits.
First there would be a government backed security you can place in your own retirement account.
Second you will have a tangible asset that you can use as a basis of credit.
Third you would have a salable asset to use to back your purchase of a home or any other type of real investment you might want to pursue.
Fourth it would eliminate the open ended obligation that is now on the back of the taxpaying public citizen.
Fifth it will wean Americans off of the government dependency merry go round.
Sixth it will restore American solvency and be a bigger stimulus than anything you ever saw.
Seventh it will give you something to pass on to your children. Thus building family cohesion.

Social Security has been like a vampire sucking blood out of this economy for 70 years. It's time to give our blood back.

Edits and additions:

I have seemingly left out provisions for disability coverages. This should be addressed in a separate fund. I am quite certain we can afford disability payments much easier than we can afford open ended retirement accounts, and death panels in state run medical coverage, intended to shorten the pay out for medical and retirement benefits. (the back door deficit reduction effort of liberal fascism)
The 2010 payout in social security disability insurance was $127 billion. Much less than the $2.336 trillion for retirement benefits that is expected to grow nearly exponentialy. This can be done from the general fund.

My ideas being stolen.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fl8GvPRvikM&feature=related


My previous prediction:

http://speaktruthtoliberals.blogspot.com/2007/12/human-telepathy-coming-soon.html

Climategate Updated

First they try to downplay the medieval warm period:
http://www.nctimes.com/app/blogs/wp/?p=7465

Then try to deny it entirely:
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/11233/1168499-373-0.stm

Then they interfere with peer review:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/feb/02/hacked-climate-emails-flaws-peer-review

The Sea level claims were bogus
http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/02/13/us-climate-seas-idUSTRE61C1V420100213

The melting of the Glaciers was bogus and exaggerated:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/jan/20/ipcc-himalayan-glaciers-mistake

The station Data were hidden:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2066240/Second-leak-climate-emails-Political-giants-weigh-bias-scientists-bowing-financial-pressure-sponsors.html

Stations were moved:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/feb/01/dispute-weather-fraud

Some are completely missing:
http://www.global-information-network-society.com/scientists-using-selective-temperature-data-skeptics-say.html

The 1990's were not the warmest on record after a glitch in a program was found:
http://www.dailytech.com/Blogger+Finds+Y2K+Bug+in+NASA+Climate+Data/article8383.htm

Carbon Trading behind the money for Climate research:
http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/0082826

And to top it all off Wikipedia was compromised:
http://spectator.org/archives/2009/12/30/wikipedia-meets-its-own-climat

Now read all about it and tell me that you have NO DOUBT about the conclusions of the IPCC.

Kiss my ass Bowerbird.

Socialism vs. Capitalism and A Representative Republic

The real problem with all forms of state controlled econmies is a simple one. There is no other outlet for mans need for power. In state controlled economies the power structure does not allow a separate track for monetary power versus political power. These meld into one and therefore become dictaorships. It has never failed. Mao, Stalin, Pol Pot, Hitler, the list is endless. The difference between this and capitalist republics is the ability to have a safety valve for those seeking personal power. With the right government structure and a well educated populace we can keep our liberties intact. But only if we keep certain people from taking over the education of our children. This is what the current fight is about in Wisconsin. It's what the fight is about across the nation.
We need to repeal the income tax amendment. [16]
We need to repeal the direct election of Senators.[17]

Chinese desert patterns.

The  giant patterns in the Chinese desert are various scientific, military and mining structures. The bright blue ones are Copper sulfate solution being dried out of solution. You can see the harvesting machinery in the one on the left (link below) near the crux of the angular conjunction. Just  zoom in on Google earth. The mining operation can be plainly seen by following the major roadway leading northeast from the site to the mountainous looking terrain north of the wide bisecting street. To the right of that you will find a group of other grid patterns that are a giant windmill farm. This grid pattern is not in the Gizmodo shots. It is located surrounding 40º40' N 95º45' E. This windmill farm has one section that is six miles long by four miles wide.

The grid pattern in the last gizmodo shot is of a giant radio telescope being built there. It is in a cross pattern if you zoom out a bit. If you zoom in much closer wou will see another grid pattern that has an alignment of tower structures that are arranged in a pattern of 4x6. I believe these to be antennae frameworks.

The concentric ring pattern is of an abandoned nuclear test zone that went unused after the Chinese gave up nuclear testing.

The square block buildings are part of another bomb testing facility, obviously for conventional bombs judging from the blast pattern and crater visible in the photo.

The facility with the cooling towers is probably just what it looks like. A nuclear power plant for the desert operations. They probably need it for times without much wind.




http://gizmodo.com/5859081/why-is-china-building-these-gigantic-structures-in-the-middle-of-the-desert

To Mark Levin.

A message to Mark Levin on his facebook page from me:

Mark. I don't think anybody has realised the link between Herman Cain's problems and Bill Clinton and the slapdown that Herman did of his healthcare plan in a debate in 1994 WHILE HE WAS AT THE National Restaurant Association.

This is why there is a link to the charges at the NRA and no other place. Clinton went after him back then for making him look bad. I'll bet we can find a link between these women and the Clinton administration.

Lakeshore and The Chronic Homeless Plan

I just sent this email to Hallerin Hilton Hill at WOKI. He seems to think people in South Knoxville are needlessly paranoid about our treatment by the city fathers.

Guess what the new facility for the "Chronically Homeless" in South Knoxville is really for Hallerin? It just so happens that Lakeshore will be shut down soon. I get this information mere hours before it will be announced to you in the press. Guess where those people will wind up? And now the Ten Year Plan is dead in the water with only one Facility built. Guess where that is Hallerin? Still think people in South Knoxville are paranoid Hallerin?


This has been a damned setup the whole time. And you're probably still going to put the blinders on for it.
I hope they pay you well. Do you sleep well Hallerin?

PS!
The Email address given by WOKI for his show kicks the emails back as undeliverable.

An open letter to the Right to work Foundation and Organized Labor

To Mark Mix at the Right to work Foundation:

Here's a question for YOU. Why haven't you pointed out that the UAW still has a $1 billion strike fund when we the taxpayer bailed out their jobs. They should have to fork that over to us.


Why haven't you done anything about this?

Why am I not believing you are serious?

To the leaders of the UAW:

You don't make me believe one word coming from your mouths. You have a billion dollar strike fund still available after the American taxpayer bailed your sorry asses out. You helped create this mess with overburdensome benefit packages you struck for. Making American Auto manufacturing uncompetitive with the rest of the world.  Your union should be banned until we can confiscate that fund.


Cough it up or shut up.

Herman Cain and the 15 minute gap

Answer me this question. How do you reach up a skirt and drag somebody's head down at the same time. One hand would block the other. Try doing this in a car seat. I dare you to test what she said in an actual factual setting. Think of the physical movements needed to do this.


It's kind of like the 15 minute gap in the Watergate tapes and the stretch that Nixons Secretary would have had to do to erase that tape.

It doesn't make any sense.

And Mark Levin pointed out that she didn't tell Mr Cain why she went out for drinks and then to dinner with him until they were seated for dinner. Kind of sounds like she was leading him to the pasture in the first place.